Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Time ticks for Anton Lienert-Brown as All Black misses final round of NPC

Anton Lienert-Brown. (Photo by Michael Bradley/Getty Images)

Despite aiming for a return to action in the final round of the NPC regular season, Anton Lienert-Brown has been omitted from the Waikato side named to tackle Bay of Plenty in Hamilton on Sunday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Lienert-Brown has been sidelined since undergoing surgery in April after suffering a shoulder injury against the Blues during Super Rugby Pacific. Early last month, the 27-year-old indicated that a return to action against the Steamers was a possibility, but Lienert-Brown is evidently not quite ready to make a return to action.

Instead, the 56-Test All Black is hopeful that he’ll make his first appearance in next weekend’s quarter-final match-up, which could see Waikato taking on any one of Wellington, Bay of Plenty or Hawke’s Bay.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Speaking on New Zealand radio station Newstalk ZB, Lienert-Brown said that while his shoulder was now ready for the physical battering it’s sure to endure when he once again takes the field, there are still some targets he needs to meet before getting back into the game.

“I’m human and I’d be lying if I said there wasn’t reluctancy going into contact,” he said.

“It’s really the thoughts beforehand. Once you’re out on the field it’s sweet as. I’m really confident that I’ve done enough contact now.

“It’s a funny one; for three or four months of the rehab period, you protect the shoulder, then the last couple of months you’re doing the opposite so it does take a while for the mind to adjust. I’ve got enough training under my belt now, and enough contact to be confident I’ll be sweet out there.

“There’s a few things I’ve got to tick off first, but I’m hoping to be playing for Waikato next week, all going well.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Blacks are set to depart for Japan and the UK at the end of the month and head coach Ian Foster will favour taking Lienert-Brown north, but might have reservations if his most experienced midfield option hasn’t managed to get many – or any – games under his belt.

Although Lienert-Brown suggested the end-of-year tour isn’t a primary goal at present, he has previously suggested he could play in the Heartland Cup – NZ’s second division of provincial rugby – in order to get some additional minutes before the squad travels.

While Lienert-Brown has been sidelined, he has been working with the Waikato coaches as the key strategist of backline strike moves.

Waikato will need all their wily plays to function if they are to tip over Bay of Plenty on Sunday. The winner of the match will sew up second spot on the table in the Odds conference, but could take out first if Counties Manukau are able to upset Wellington.

ADVERTISEMENT

Waikato: Tepaea Cook-Saveage, Mosese Dawai, Bailyn Sullivan, D’Angelo Leuila, Daniel Sinkinson, Damian McKenzie, Xavier Roe, Luke Jacobson, Mitch Jacobson, Samipeni Finau, Laghlan McWhannell, Hamilton Burr, Sefo Kautai, Rhys Marshall, Ollie Norris. Reserves: Pita Anae Ah-Sue, Rob Cobb, George Dyer, Patrick McCurran, Jack Lam, Cortez Ratima, Tana Tuhakaraina, Liam Coombes-Fabling.

ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
SK 14 minutes ago
Who is telling the truth about France's tour of New Zealand?

From what I am seeing in the comments there seems to be a battle about the playing time discussion and not counting minutes across the season like Champions Cup and Autumn tours. I think we also have to remember is that in the Autumn internationals the French players are fully fit having played just a few rounds of Top 14 while NZ and Aus have played the whole year. They put out players who have played 17 games plus 9 or 10 internationals and have over 2000 minutes in total. What is clear is that France have the same problem but choose to rest players. One cannot deny it detracts from the series and perhaps the French should have sent a stronger team when you consider the fact that after a long season the All Blacks do send a strong site. France are taking a player welfare stance because they have to confront the realities of the Top 14 and the powerful clubs as well as their demands. No other union has the same constraints and instead choose how to manage their players. The question is are players being run into the ground? The real issue we should be discussing here should be player welfare and what is acceptable for minutes? In my opinion a larger debate needs to be opened up in the game about player management. This tour cuts to the heart of it because it has drastically reduced the quality of the series but in the end I cannot blame France or Galthie for taking these actions neither can I blame NZ for being miffed about it.

139 Go to comments
B
BleedRed&Black 16 minutes ago
Who is telling the truth about France's tour of New Zealand?

Ok, so thanks to the wonder that is allrugby, I checked the facts, then compared it to France's 2025 6N squad, so the last time showed they up as strong as they could. Of the 46 players selected, only 15 are touring NZ. Of those missing, 23 players are at least two full matches within the claimed 2000 minute "limit". Even if Jalibert, who has the highest number at 1847, played the two tests he would be eligible for, he would only be on 2007 minutes.


Hooker

Lamothe 1482 BB

Marchand 1321 TL

Mauvaka 982 TL

Prop

Aldegheri 1303 TL

Atonio 955

Baille 635 TL

Gros 1076

Priso 1414 TU

Lock

Meafou 1503 TL


Loose Fwd

Roumat 1667 TL

Jelonch 1401 TL

Alldritt 1804

Boudehent 1678

Cros 1759 TL

Gazzotti 1516 BB

Jegou 1142


Halfback

Serin 1693


First Five

Jalibert 1847 BB

Ntamack 1479 TL


Midfield

Frisch 705 TU

Nene 669

Brau-Boirie 1239


Wing

Dréan 1418 TU


The idea that France has brought a C team to NZ because of player welfare is, as the article suggests, a fiction. Some of the numbers on the players not going on tour are tiny, with five less than a thousand. Most in that 23 wouldn't get anywhere near 2000 minutes even of they played every minute of every test. Equally, the idea that "player welfare" is important in France is given the lie by the fact that they have five players from that 6N squad [all of course not touring] who are over 2000 minutes, Lucu 2106, Moefana 2174, Bielle-Biarrey 2277, Penaud 2045 and Ramos 2205. World class players flogged in a sequence of anonymous games [outside France] instead of having a once in a lifetime opportunity to play the All Blacks in a test series in NZ. Oh well.


France has sent a C team to NZ because they are not obliged to send anything else, either for legal or commercial reasons. So they have. The Top 14 clubs want their players preparing for next seasons "10 month soap opera". These tests means nothing to them. These tests mean nothing to their public either. France has been repeatedly humiliated by NZ, but those humiliations are quickly forgotten, so there are no consequences. It is equally true that the public and the clubs couldn't care less what their players want. Those players desire to win in the country it is hardest to win in means nothing to them. What Alldritt and Ntamack want means nothing to them. What a sad, small minded, provincial place French rugby is. It really might as well be rugby league.

139 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'Big men': England U20 scrum coach Nathan Catt verdict on Junior Boks 'Big men': England U20 scrum coach Nathan Catt verdict on Junior Boks
Search
OSZAR »