Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Springboks player ratings vs Italy | Castle Lager Incoming Series

South Africa's centre and captain Jesse Kriel (C) speaks to his teammates during a water break during the international rugby union Test match between South Africa and Italy at Loftus Versfeld stadium in Pretoria on July 5, 2025. (Photo by PHILL MAGAKOE / AFP) (Photo by PHILL MAGAKOE/AFP via Getty Images)

Springboks player ratings: The Springboks never looked like losing to a second-string Italian outfit but this was hardly a vintage performance in a 42–24 victory.

ADVERTISEMENT

For the vast majority of the contest, men in green ran hard and straight at tacklers in white. There was little variety, with just the occasional spark.

The second half was plagued by ill discipline and a lack of accuracy. Only a handful of players excelled across a staccato game that saw the breakdown disintegrate and the vaunted Bomb Squad explode with all the menace of a Christmas cracker. Still, a win is a win and the Test season is up and running.

Video Spacer

British & Irish Lions in collaboration with the RugbyPass App

World Rugby and the British & Irish Lions announce a groundbreaking strategic collaboration that will see the RugbyPass App become the designated home of the British & Irish Lions Tour to Australia in 2025.

Download Now

Video Spacer

British & Irish Lions in collaboration with the RugbyPass App

World Rugby and the British & Irish Lions announce a groundbreaking strategic collaboration that will see the RugbyPass App become the designated home of the British & Irish Lions Tour to Australia in 2025.

1. Ox Nche – 8
Another imperious display in the scrum. A penalty machine who provides continued go-forward ball. South Africa’s second try was scored by Morne van den Berg, but it belonged to the Springboks pack and their mighty front row, who shoved the Italians over their own line.
Replaced by Jan-Hendrik Wessels on 47 minutes.

2. Malcolm Marx – 7
Relatively quiet by his usually lofty standards but still a menace with ball in hand while also landing nine tackles. Nailed one long throw from the line-out to cap off an all-round show.
Replaced by Bongi Mbonambi on 47 minutes.

Fixture
Internationals
South Africa
42 - 24
Full-time
Italy
All Stats and Data

3. Wilco Louw – 8
Strong scrumming and robust carrying. His heft was a constant threat whenever he was involved.
Replaced by Vincent Koch on 47 minutes.

4. Eben Etzebeth – 6
Industrious without being overly dominant. The Italians targeted his runs and doubled up on the big man. Showed great energy in the loose, where he was also deployed as a high kick chaser, occasionally winning the ball back. Handy in the line-out.
Replaced by RG Snyman on 47 minutes.

ADVERTISEMENT

5. Lood de Jager – 5
Made 10 tackles but was relatively anonymous barring a few line-out contributions. Just one of those games for the star second-rower.
Replaced by Franco Mostert on 47 minutes.

6. Marco van Staden – 7
Strong carries and ruck clearances. Van Staden ticked most of the boxes that need ticking from a Boks No. 6 and bagged a deserving try late in the piece. Perhaps could have shown more in the trams and in the loose with ball in hand.

7. Vincent Tshituka – 6
A special day for the 26-year-old who completed his journey from child refugee from the Congo to Springbok starter. Elite sport, though, doesn’t always deliver the fairytale, and the debutant had a try chalked off after Nche found himself in an offside position as Damien Willemse burst upfield on a counter that ended with Tshituka dotting down in the corner.
Elsewhere he was simply OK. The entire back row failed to gain the upper hand at the breakdown as South Africa lost 10 turnovers in the first half alone. Tshituka, along with the rest of the trio at the back of the pack, loses points as a consequence.

8. Jasper Wiese – 8
Offered strong carries with plenty of go-forward ball, acting as a battering ram. One of the few players on the pitch who benefitted from the ultra-narrow game plan.
Replaced by Kwagga Smith on 56 minutes.

ADVERTISEMENT

9. Morne van den Berg – 6.5
Zippy and busy, he also notched his first and second Test tries. His opener was simple—he merely had to fall onto the ball after a South African scrum consumed the Italian pack right in front of the poles. His second was more impressive, dummied and stepped from close range.
Elsewhere he was slightly one-dimensional with ball in play. This was no fault of his own—he was clearly following instructions. Still, it was hard to gauge van den Berg’s creative output when he was primarily asked to hit one-up runners with short passes.
Replaced by Faf de Klerk on 54 minutes.

10. Handre Pollard – 6.5
Didn’t see much of the ball in the first half as the Boks persisted with a one-pass game off the scrum-half. Showed more intent in patches across the second half but still struggled to find fluency. His kicking was faultless, as you’d expect from the human metronome with ice in his veins. Earns an extra half point for his unnervingly accurate right boot.

11. Kurt-Lee Arendse – 8.5
Scarcely touched the ball for half an hour before he ventured off his wing to receive the ball off the top of a line-out. From midfield, he exploded through the half gap and in the blink of an eye was diving over for a try. He now has 19 tries in 25 matches for the Springboks. One of the world’s best showed his all-round value with a stunning try-saving tackle in the corner around the hour mark, sprinting across and shunting the sliding Simone Gesi out a fraction of a second before the ball was grounded.

12. Damian de Allende – 7
Won just about every collision he was involved in, as you’d expect. What really stood out were the neat touches in close quarters and accurate kicks off the toe. One grubber set up Jesse Kriel’s opening try and another raking kick into space sparked the sequence that led to South Africa’s second, scored by van den Berg off the back of a dominant scrum.
Replaced by Willie le Roux on 63 minutes.

13. Jesse Kriel – 7
Once one of the most divisive players in South African rugby, Kriel became the 67th man to captain the Springboks and capped off the achievement with a 10th-minute try, latching onto a grubber from his long-time midfield partner. An assured performance.

14. Cheslin Kolbe – 6
Mostly a spectator, particularly in the first half where the ball almost never went beyond the 12 channel. Still, his whirring feet meant that bums lifted off seats whenever he got his hands on the pill.

15. Damian Willemse – 6
Playing in green and gold for the first time since the 2023 World Cup final, Willemse’s most telling contribution was scrapped from the record books as Nche obstructed a would-be Italian tackler following a devastating counter from the fullback. Willemse never put a foot wrong but was a peripheral figure as a consequence of the Boks’ conservative approach.

16. Bongi Mbonambi – 4
His first two line-outs ended in turnovers. Could not add impetus off the bench.

17. Jan-Hendrik Wessels – 4
Didn’t impact the game as the second half fizzled into a bit of a drab affair.

18. Vincent Koch – 6
Rumbled over for a try from close range, rounding off a rare slick move that saw several offloads and continuity between players. As a result, the only member of the Bomb Squad who earns a positive score.

19. RG Snyman – 4
Landed one stiff tackle but, like most of the Bomb Squad, could not add any extra heft from the bench. In fact, things seemed to fall apart when the heavy hitters entered the scene.

20. Franco Mostert – 4
Hardly the only player to blame but part of a poor show in the second half with the replacements unable to live up to the hype and fireworks that accompanied their introduction.

21. Kwagga Smith – 4
Could not rectify the very serious concerns at the breakdown that cost South Africa two soft tries in the second half.

22. Faf de Klerk – 5
Added control when he had front-foot ball. Could have done with some help from the changed pack in front of him.

23. Willie le Roux – 5
Now just one away from 100 appearances for the Springboks. Was this the penultimate Test match for Willie le Roux? If it was, it wasn’t one to remember. He had just one opportunity to influence the game when the ball broke down the left with runners in support. Perhaps an earlier version of the assist king would have better timed his pass to Arendse. Instead, the Boks had to recycle the move, which would end with van Staden busting over the line.

Related


News, stats, videos and more! Download the new RugbyPass app, in collaboration with the British and Irish Lions, on the App Store (iOS) and Google Play (Android) now!

ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

t
takata 1 hour ago
Can Les Bleus avoid a Black-wash in New Zealand?

but I do not accept that international rugby and who plays France in France doesn’t matter not a big deal we will just get somebody else who cares ?


I’m sorry, my bad, it doesn’t sound right when read under this angle


This part of my post you are refering to was certainly poorly worded as I wasn’t weighting an AB test playing in France (or not) vs the huge audience and media attention it gets all the time, or not, if not played.


By “not a big deal”, I mostly meant financially for FFR as, contrary to many other Rugby Unions (most as broke as FFR) who are still making nearly all their money with such big events tickets sale, FFR is not. Using the Stade de France* even when it was sold out or near full capacity (something garanteed for an AB game) was only for the operator to turn on profits. Hence they would survive an AB boycott because not as much was at stake compared to other Unions who are still desperately chasing the biggest crowds as possible in order to survive.


Also, I don’t think that the NZRU could push other Unions to boycott France over sending a development team on summer tours, like say when South Africa was boycotted over apartheid. So, the FFR would also survive that (with less audience but less drama).


Because WR can’t help without juridiction on team selection, France is simply fulfilling their engagement by sending whatever team they want. By the way, that’s why WR is trying to sell a “Nation League?” instead of tours, in order to up what’s at stakes but it probably won’t change anything for the French selection in July.


(*) conditions were reviewed and improved, as FFR was going to reconsider playing in the Stade de France at all.


you would expect the first game since Bok world champs knocked the French boys out at the WC surely would be more than that? that’s how I would market it anyhow !! Revenge game ! And that will be a major rugby event even tho u don’t think so

When you are overstretched and can’t do everything with the means at your disposal, the best way is to rank those tasks and assign your best forces following priorities:

- WC knock out game

- 6 Nations Chelem or decider game

- WC pool game

- (…)

- November International

- July International


Looks like what Galthié is doing is also matching priorities for the French public manipulated by the media coverage.


But the domestic record audience was for a WC knock out game which wasn’t vs. RSA in 2023. Why would an old game vs England score above 20 million and a pool game vs New Zealand with low drama would nearly score as much as this knock out quarter final.


I don’t know but maybe it’s because England are the French arch-enemies, ABs’ are the most renowned team and RSA is simply not there yet. We’ll see and I certainly can be wrong in my pronostic and 15 million will turn up for this game.

302 Go to comments
t
takata 3 hours ago
Can Les Bleus avoid a Black-wash in New Zealand?

Please, tell me who exactly are all those millionaires owning the Top 14?


And, by the way, can you tell me who are also those that ever transformed a single French club into their cash cow?


It’s probably an old cliché comming from, some time ago in early pro time, the revival of both Ile-de-France clubs by private investors like J. Lorenzetti at Racing 92, or the rise of Toulon’s “Gallacticos” under Mourad Boudjellal, ending with the very noisy late Altrad investments into Montpellier-Hérault. Even if a few major titles were collected by those clubs, and that it would indeniably have helped to rise the fame of the whole Top 14, the global return on private investments simply didn’t ever pay back what they put in.


Another look into the last decade will show you that French clubs are not millionaires pet-projects either. From this season top 6, amongst Stade Toulousain (1st), Union Bordeaux-Bègles (2nd), Rugby Club Toulonnais (3rd), l’Aviron Bayonnais (4th), Clermont-Auvergne (5th) and Castres Olympique (6th), only the last two are backed by historical corporate entities: Michelin (tires) for Clermont and Laboratoires Pierre Fabre (pharma) for Castres.


That’s long term sponsorship from those city main industries and, with Stade Toulousain since 1907, Clermont and Castres (one of the lowest budget in Top 14), are also the oldest members of the French rugby club elite. This certainly prove some healthy stability in their management. They are in fact as far away from marketing “products” that they are from Paris.


But in Top 14, as reflected by their national team selection, club power is certainly measured by their success. The most successful of them all, Stade Toulousain, reached a 2023-2024 budget comparable with the lower end of a French elite football club (those not named PSG) and half of it’s income (€30 millions) was comming from merchandising sales only. Last monday, UBB sold out, in a matter of few hours, its 20K season ticket (out of their 32K seats stadium) and La Rochelle’s stadium was also sold out faster than I can type it for every single game of last season; and so on.


Now, take only those three clubs providing 90% of the national team and paying 100% of their wages. Tell them that the share of the limited game time allowed to their top players, will rise from 25% to 40% for the national team, without any further compensation for the club than allowing them to spend more in recruitment (of probably lesser quality substitutes).


See how it goes now with their board and Presidents, even if probably all of them are turning real profits.

302 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING British & Irish Lions player ratings vs Brumbies | 2025 Lions series British & Irish Lions players ratings vs Brumbies | 2025 Lions series
Search
OSZAR »